Contribution deserves
a credible record.
Explore the proposed Civic Score and certificate designs. Recognition should explain the work behind it, with explicit consent for personal participation.
Make participation
mean something.
A Civic Score should reflect meaningful contribution, with verified outcomes carrying more weight than activity alone.
Contribution over clicks.Filing, posting or repeating an action should never be a shortcut to recognition.
Progress without pressure.Streaks belong to civic lessons only. No reporting streaks. No guilt mechanics.
Your choice comes first.Personal recognition is opt-in. School assessment stays at institution and class level.
What deserves
to move the score?
Choose an action to explore the principle. This is a demonstration, not an account.
More than a badge.
A record of doing.
Recognition should connect back to what happened, how it was assessed and the evidence behind it.
Design example only. Not an issued credential or an accredited qualification.
Example School
Civic learning & shared-space participation
A sample record connecting institution-led activities with reviewed evidence and collective participation.
NOT VALID
Recognition with
individual choice.
Who can be assessed?＋
Institutions can be assessed. Personal recognition requires explicit opt-in. Schoolchildren are never individually scored or behaviour-tracked.
Is this the final scoring formula?＋
No. The demonstration explains intended principles. Final weights, limits and anti-abuse rules are still being defined.
Can someone give me a negative score?＋
No. The design does not allow other people to negatively score an individual.
Is the certificate accredited?＋
The examples are not issued credentials or accredited qualifications. The long-term ambition is a trusted recognition standard, not a claim of accreditation today.
Build recognition into a meaningful programme.
Start with the work your institution wants to do.